Automation Without Connectivity – Why Take The Risk?

I’m thrilled to introduce Steve Kuciemba as my first guest blogger! Steve Kuciemba is the National Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Practice Leader for WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff.  With nearly 30 years of experience under his belt, Steve has a unique background having previously worked for an automobile manufacturer, a state department of transportation, and a national non-profit industry association.  

It was recently revealed that the driver of a Tesla Model S was killed while his car was engaged in the “autopilot” mode – a semi-self driving feature that allows the vehicle to take over certain aspects of the driving task.  The facts of the case are still under investigation, but a number of details have been revealed: (1) a tractor-trailer coming in the opposite direction made a left turn in front of the Tesla, (2) the front-facing camera and radar failed to distinguish the threat because of bright sun and a solid white trailer, and (3) the driver of the Tesla was allegedly not paying attention and failed to notice the hazard ahead.  It was a tragic accident and investigators are currently sorting through conflicting witness reports, whether or not the conditions can be repeated in a test condition, and most importantly – why did the driver of the truck make a sudden turn in front of the path of the oncoming Tesla in the first place.

Some of the media jumped all over automated self-driving technology – despite the fact that this Autopilot feature in the Tesla Model S was never intended to be a fully self-driving capacity where the driver can take their attention away from the driving task.  The automaker has provided numerous warnings about drivers remaining focused, keeping hands on the wheel, and keeping feet nearby the pedals.  This was, unfortunately, an early glimpse at the possibilities that technology can offer – and the tragic dangers of misusing or misunderstanding the capabilities and limitations that accompany it.

This is also a case where connected vehicle technology – V2V and V2I – could have provided the additional data that would have enabled the vehicle to alert the driver to an impending collision, or could have taken corrective action such as engaging emergency braking capacity.  Even though the onboard cameras and sensors missed the conflict, with connectivity the vehicles would have known of each other’s positions and provided a back-up; and if nothing else a warning that something was amiss. Had the truck and car both been outfitted with connected vehicle technology, the truck driver might not have made the dangerous turn in the first place – either by way of in-vehicle warning or by way of automatic override of the driving task.  Accident conditions prevented.  It is my opinion that automation without connectivity is a risk we don’t have to live with – especially since the industry is making great progress.  Protect the spectrum, promote the installation of vehicle and roadside technology, and break down policy barriers to CV implementation.  The safety benefit is worth it, don’t you think?

About Lauren Isaac

Lauren Isaac is the Director of Business Initiatives for the North American operation of EasyMile. Easymile provides electric, driverless shuttles that are designed to cover short distances in multi-use environments. Prior to working at EasyMile, Lauren worked at WSP where she was involved in various projects involving advanced technologies that can improve mobility in cities. Lauren wrote a guide titled “Driving Towards Driverless: A Guide for Government Agencies” regarding how local and regional governments should respond to autonomous vehicles in the short, medium, and long term. In addition, Lauren maintains the blog, “Driving Towards Driverless”, and has presented on this topic at more than 75 industry conferences. She recently did a TEDx Talk, and has been published in Forbes and the Chicago Tribune among other publications.
This entry was posted in Driverless Car Impacts and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Automation Without Connectivity – Why Take The Risk?

  1. Blair Schlecter says:

    I agree with your points. I’m sure the introduction of the car in the 20th century led to accidents that would not have occurred had people been riding horses instead. But people nevertheless embraced the technology. I think the same will happen here. The net effect of autonomous vehicles will be a huge decrease in human fatalities.

    Like

  2. Chris w says:

    I’m curious which special interest groups or companies may stand to gain from this by inciting doubt that AV and CV technology is ready. If action has already been taken in the press or in Washington

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s